Quote:
|
Originally Posted by walkerboh4269
Yes i think that we should have access to what ever weapons the government may have.
As far as using those weapons to protect my home.... a flame thrower or a chemical weapon would be the wrong choice as I am cause more damage to what I am trying to protect than what I am protecting against.
When it comes down to it anything can be used as a weapon the chair you are sitting on even to computer you use to visit this board. All guns are just tools they are not evil and cannot act on there own.
The greatest protection we have in this country is the 2A. As has been said before it is the one right that protects all others. It is the ultimate check and balance against corruption in the government.
|
I understand that those weapons might not be practical. But the logical and moral implication is basically this.
America recently went to war over alleged WMD in Iraq, yet you are in favour of the American population having access to WMD (in theory, I accept they arent practical)
The UN is fighting for the non-proliferation of atomic weapons in places like Korea and Iran, yet in theory, you are saying that ordinary American citizens should have access to atomic weapos.