Quote:
|
Originally Posted by walkerboh4269
I for one believe that the 2A covers this already and any law that restricts my ability to carry or own my choice of weapon is unconstitutional.
|
But surely there is a line somewhere? Even if it is only weapons that can reasonably be used for self defence.
Should you be allowed to carry a rocket launcher, a flame thrower? To drive a tank? To set up SAM missiles in your yard? Create chemical weapons to use against intruders on your property? Protect your house with land mines?
Surely the right to bare arms has to be limited to weapons that function as a means of self defence?