|
Overall, I think it was a very close debate (if we can actually call it a debate). Bush clearly did much better than the last meeting, but I do not think it was a victory. In general, if you are a supporter of either candidate you can easily claim they won. Most of the Network "undecided groups" called it a tie and said it did not settle the question and I think that is pretty accurate. Bush came off as resolute, but a bit fed up with Kerry. He had high points and low points. His personal convictions, confidence and tenacity came through clearly. Kerry had few high or low points, but maintained a strong overall performance. His poise and breadth of knowledge came through clearly. If I had to pick a winner, it would be Kerry, but that is most likely because I am a big supporter and have very similar views to the Senator.
IMO - If Bush did not have a good outing, he was going to lose. A stong win for Kerry would have tipped the scale for Kerry. A tie is a minor plus for Kerry, but puts the onus on next Wednesday in Tempe.
__________________
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so."
-Douglas Adams
|