This whole thread is sure interesting to me. Perhaps I didn't serve my intended purpose be bring Clinton's name into things. But I sure see a good demonstration of how subtleties are lost, how we would rather talk bjs than the topic at hand, and how rabid the Clinton name makes people.
I suggested that I would understand if people disagreed with which situation was worse, but that I saw them as both bad. Had a couple of instant defenses of what Bush did, and even an attack on me. And I thought I couldn't be shocked.
I'm of the belief that it's ok to be partisan. But that it's better to recognize that I am, and let that knowledge temper my responses. I'm for Kerry in this election. I think 'my' side is 2 and 0 in the debates. But I see the glasses through which I'm looking. And I that helps me understand how many could see a Cheney victory. I'm still trying to figure out how anyone could see a Bush victory...
But I really question whether many even see their own bias. And that's a shame, too.
Although lying about a policy speech to get free airtime is a bigger shame
