All right, I'm about tired of all this. Clinton lied in a grand jury hearing. That's perjury. He broke the law. Yes it was over a ridiculous subject, but he still broke the law.
To call Bush a liar about Iraq is ridiculous. He was given intelligence, and he had to interpret it. Although the Senate didn't have much time to look at that intelligence, they agreed with the president that Houssein had WMD. That was wrong. But he was wrong with Kerry, Edwards, and just about everyone else in Congress.
As for Bush's stump speech, he's been changing the content of his speech pretty commonly lately, but it does seem like the campaign pulled a fast one.
And if you want to know if the media is liberal, read this:
http://www.aei.org/news/newsID.21338...ews_detail.asp
"Actual economic data explains much about the headlines--but far from everything. We found that the incidence of positive coverage during Republican presidencies was fairly steady--but economic news under President Clinton received by far the most positive coverage. This partisan gap or bias (the difference in positive headlines between Republicans and Democrats for the same underlying economic news) consistently implied that Democrats got between 10 and 20 percentage points more positive headlines."