View Single Post
Old 10-07-2004, 08:33 AM   #38 (permalink)
NoSoup
Non-Rookie
 
NoSoup's Avatar
 
Location: Green Bay, WI
Well, I suppose I could throw something in here...

At the time of the attacks, I believe a Mr. Silverstein was the leaseholder on the Word Trade Center. He did an interview shortly afterward with a Public Service station - that aired only once. Basically, when he was talking about Building 7, he said that a firefighter had called him up and said that the damage was too extensive. Mr Silverstein, having no other choice, said to go ahead and "pull" it.

For those of you that don't know, "Pull" is a common term used to descibed detonating the charges in controlled building collapses.

Pretty interesting, in my opinion - so much of what happened on 9/11 is so very questionable...

Another factor that doesn't quite add up - there was a shot that was broadcast live on CNN - again, only once. Basically, what it showed was both of the trade centers still standing tall, after both had been hit. On the bottom of the screen, however, there is a giant, approximately 50 story tall plume of smoke/dust. Keep in mind, however, that the collapse had not occured yet, and as far as public knowledge goes, there never was any explosives or anything that could have caused that cloud to occur at all, much less be so enourmous.

In a very respectable magazine, "People" I believe, they interviewed some of the firefighters. I wish I could quote it, but basically it states somthing along the lines of "... as the bomb went off...."

There were many, many reports of explosions occuring in the towers. Admittedly, though, there was a lot of confusion and I am sure that many people aren't really experienced to really identify the sounds, but I would imagine that the firefighters would at least be fairly reliable in this case...

One other thing I'll delve into, but I am not really sure as to the reliability of the information, as it depends on eyewitness accounts... Basically, the first plane was descrived as a having a blue marking on it - and no windows. It was not ever really even considered to be commercial, until we were informed otherwise.

I have not been able to find this particular interview online at all, but I remember, for certain, right after the pennsylvania crash there was an interview with a lady - and she also said that the plane that she saw was not a commercial airliner. I believe that she even went as far to say that they looked like fighter jets...? If anyone could point me in the direction of this interview, I would be much appreciated.
__________________
I have an aura of reliability and good judgement.

Just in case you were wondering...
NoSoup is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360