Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

NoSoup · 10-07-2004, 08:33 AM

Well, I suppose I could throw something in here...

At the time of the attacks, I believe a Mr. Silverstein was the leaseholder on the Word Trade Center. He did an interview shortly afterward with a Public Service station - that aired only once. Basically, when he was talking about Building 7, he said that a firefighter had called him up and said that the damage was too extensive. Mr Silverstein, having no other choice, said to go ahead and "pull" it.

For those of you that don't know, "Pull" is a common term used to descibed detonating the charges in controlled building collapses.

Pretty interesting, in my opinion - so much of what happened on 9/11 is so very questionable...

Another factor that doesn't quite add up - there was a shot that was broadcast live on CNN - again, only once. Basically, what it showed was both of the trade centers still standing tall, after both had been hit. On the bottom of the screen, however, there is a giant, approximately 50 story tall plume of smoke/dust. Keep in mind, however, that the collapse had not occured yet, and as far as public knowledge goes, there never was any explosives or anything that could have caused that cloud to occur at all, much less be so enourmous.

In a very respectable magazine, "People" I believe, they interviewed some of the firefighters. I wish I could quote it, but basically it states somthing along the lines of "... as the bomb went off...."

There were many, many reports of explosions occuring in the towers. Admittedly, though, there was a lot of confusion and I am sure that many people aren't really experienced to really identify the sounds, but I would imagine that the firefighters would at least be fairly reliable in this case...

One other thing I'll delve into, but I am not really sure as to the reliability of the information, as it depends on eyewitness accounts... Basically, the first plane was descrived as a having a blue marking on it - and no windows. It was not ever really even considered to be commercial, until we were informed otherwise.

I have not been able to find this particular interview online at all, but I remember, for certain, right after the pennsylvania crash there was an interview with a lady - and she also said that the plane that she saw was not a commercial airliner. I believe that she even went as far to say that they looked like fighter jets...? If anyone could point me in the direction of this interview, I would be much appreciated.

10-07-2004, 08:33 AM	#38 (permalink)
NoSoup Non-Rookie Location: Green Bay, WI	Well, I suppose I could throw something in here... At the time of the attacks, I believe a Mr. Silverstein was the leaseholder on the Word Trade Center. He did an interview shortly afterward with a Public Service station - that aired only once. Basically, when he was talking about Building 7, he said that a firefighter had called him up and said that the damage was too extensive. Mr Silverstein, having no other choice, said to go ahead and "pull" it. For those of you that don't know, "Pull" is a common term used to descibed detonating the charges in controlled building collapses. Pretty interesting, in my opinion - so much of what happened on 9/11 is so very questionable... Another factor that doesn't quite add up - there was a shot that was broadcast live on CNN - again, only once. Basically, what it showed was both of the trade centers still standing tall, after both had been hit. On the bottom of the screen, however, there is a giant, approximately 50 story tall plume of smoke/dust. Keep in mind, however, that the collapse had not occured yet, and as far as public knowledge goes, there never was any explosives or anything that could have caused that cloud to occur at all, much less be so enourmous. In a very respectable magazine, "People" I believe, they interviewed some of the firefighters. I wish I could quote it, but basically it states somthing along the lines of "... as the bomb went off...." There were many, many reports of explosions occuring in the towers. Admittedly, though, there was a lot of confusion and I am sure that many people aren't really experienced to really identify the sounds, but I would imagine that the firefighters would at least be fairly reliable in this case... One other thing I'll delve into, but I am not really sure as to the reliability of the information, as it depends on eyewitness accounts... Basically, the first plane was descrived as a having a blue marking on it - and no windows. It was not ever really even considered to be commercial, until we were informed otherwise. I have not been able to find this particular interview online at all, but I remember, for certain, right after the pennsylvania crash there was an interview with a lady - and she also said that the plane that she saw was not a commercial airliner. I believe that she even went as far to say that they looked like fighter jets...? If anyone could point me in the direction of this interview, I would be much appreciated. __________________ I have an aura of reliability and good judgement. Just in case you were wondering...