What I said was that because you made such an obvious mistake (the Mac right click mistake) the rest of the information on Mac was suspect.
"If he is not aware of something as simple as mouse ability on an Apple made computer, he does not know very much about Macs, much like someone who does not know the pothagorean therum is not going to be a good mathemitician. Becuase this information source is now suspect, the rest of the information presented is also suspect. He may know a great deal about PCs, but he might not. He claimed to have used Macs extensively but made a simple error."
You were very selective in your understanding of what I said. I said that you may know a great deal of PCs, but you might not. You lost credibility with the mouse claim and I pointed it out. I DID NOT SAY THAT YOU DON'T KNOW MUCH ABOUT PCS. I said that you might or night not. Do you understand the difference? You think I said you didn't know PCs, I said you might or might not know PCs. See the difference?
|