Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stompy
He's the leader of our country. If he's unable to communicate and convey ideas ON THE SPOT in something as SIMPLE as a debate (simple compared to the plethora of other public events they attend and take part in) and gets incredibly flustered trying to explain things that HE (or I guess his adminstration) came up with and decided on, then how is HE fit to lead us?
How could one POSSIBLY think that someone like that is fit to lead?
|
Simple. Action is more important than words. And although he's subpar at words, he's good enough to fulfill his job requirements. Which do not include correct pronounciation of foreign leaders and countries on demand (as preferable as that is).
I plan on voting for Bush because I consider him superior to Kerry in terms of action (based on how Kerry acts and how he would likely act as president), and because I consider that superiority more important than Kerry's superiority over Bush in terms of verbal skills. Of course, this is a broad, non-specific way of describing my reasons for voting Bush.