Quote:
|
Originally Posted by adysav
In essence you're agreeing with me but you don't realise.
Firstly, the survey was not connected to my piece on court rulings, what people believe is what people believe and nothing more. [and on and on...]
|
This is getting hopeless. What you are discussing has nothing to do with nature, it has everything to do with society. I know what the difference is and I have been consistent in qualifying it. You haven't, for instance, you have just said: "The people who make up the judicial system are educated people who, due to the nature of their work, have to be less prejudiced than most people." These people are not scientists, anthropologists, or sociologists. They are not experts in the nature of humanity, and they aren't authorities on this manner. This is a flaw in argumentative logic. When citing authorities, they need to be relevent to the subject matter.