Thread: RAID vs SATA HD
View Single Post
Old 09-30-2004, 06:07 PM   #2 (permalink)
theburner
Canadian Beer Ambassador
 
Location: Cumming, GA
I tried my system both ways...
IC7-Max3 Board
2x 120GB SATA 7200 RPM 8MB Cache in Raid 0. I used 128kb stripes, which is too large. If I was to do it again, I would just down to 64kb.
Ran the same Drives in legacy mode, with 1 as master the other as slave.

Can't remember my exact scores, but there was a negligable difference between the two scores. I left them in Raid 0 to increase the size of my "C:" Drive.

If I was to do it over again, I would run them both in RAID 1 so that if a drive fails I just change my bios and keep playing. Raid 0 right now isn't that much faster. It does have faster burst speeds, but practicle isn't much faster at all.

BTW, there is no such thing as "RAID Drives". It is a RAID Chip or RAID Card..
__________________
Take Off Eh!
theburner is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73