|
sorry stompy, but that list you posted in that thread was full of inconsistencies. it really didn't prove anything but the author's partisanship.
i'm not sure i would draw such parallel lines from one sides attacks to the others. they seem to have varying amounts of relevance and cogency. i agree that kerry tanning or botox attacks are really very silly. but, i think their equivalents on the left side of the aisle are the "bush is a cowboy" kind of comments and not the ones listed above. both (botox and cowboy) may be true, but i really don't care about either.
this is kind of pigeon-holing your arguments (so i admit i'm playing dirty pool), but perhaps the fact that one side's attacks stick and the others don't tells you something about the candidates themselves.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.
~ Winston Churchill
|