OFKU0

I don't know if Cat Stevens knew he was supporting terror or not. Who does? But the ties to calling Israel a 'so-called new society' and 'so-called religion' surely puts him at the fore front as a terrorist since free speech doesn't apply to anything Israeli related unless it is a ringing endorsement. Other words it's hate propoganda. Therefore he must be a terrorist.

As for the source, the National Post, I would consider others before this rag since this paper is so pro-Israeli it is ridiculous. Wouldn't surprise me if the context has been changed to put Cat Stevens in a negative light. Afterall this is a paper that changed a Reuters story last week (the wording, to suit it's needs) without permission from Reuters to do so.

Also this same paper yesterday justified Israel going into Syria to blow up a terrorist. I don't have a problem with Israel killing terrorists. But just doing as they please in another country devoid of all diplomacy? Oh, I forgot, this is Israel we are speaking of. They can do what ever they want when they want to. I can just imagine the U.S response if Canada blew up a terrorist like Israel did, say in mid-town Manhattan in the middle of the day without any dialogue between the countries. Do you think the U.S would be pissed? But I digress.

__________________
" In Canada, you can tell the most blatant lie in a calm voice, and people will believe you over someone who's a little passionate about the truth." David Warren, Western Standard.