weee, internet
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by filtherton
As far as i know, unless i see a name and an article from a reputable source, i don't know your friend from jayson blair.
|
Obviously every study is worthless without a reputable name attached, and every reputable supplier of articles is unbiased and 100% accurate. Different methods produce different outcomes even with the best of intentions.
Why don't you pick up on all the cases where people are blatantly lying.
"Same-sex marriages do not suffer from problems of being weak relationships, complicated custody/inheritance/divorce settlements, birth defects or abuse within the relationship any more then normal heterosexual marriages." courtesy of Mantus.
Where does this information come from? How did someone manage to study homosexual marriage when it isn't legal yet?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by filtherton
So now we've gone from "Men are less capable of raising children." to "Men and women are physically and psychologically different."
|
I'm trying to establish that women are clearly naturally predisposed to the care of children by their nature. It comes naturally to women.
During the incest argument, you basically claim there must be some validity in the incest taboo because most people believe so. I don't know about where you live, but where I live most people would consider the mother the better parent.
It would be very hard to prove, but that does not make it wrong by default. I have yet to see proof to the contrary. (Conveniently the burden of proof appears to fall on me every time, even when it seems so obvious to everyone else that their arguments are correct regardless of evidence.)