Quote:
|
Originally Posted by OpieCunningham
Why would you vote on something based specifically on assue its partisan methodology instead of the ielf?
If you do not support electoral vote splits, you should vote against it and oppose it in all other states (start with the Red if you like). If you do support electoral vote splits, you should vote for it - and then support it in all other states (start with the Blue if you like).
But to just vote against something because someone from a different political party suggested it is an obscene affront to the concept of voting.
|
you're kidding, right?
Your response to my post has nothing to do with what I said. You might want to re-read my post and edit yours or post again.
Let me recap:
1) From what I can tell, it is only being proposed in states that Kerry is losing in or that Gore lost in 2000.
2) It should be all or none. I would not vote for this measure AS I MENTIONED IN MY POST.
3) The fact that this measure is proposed in a state like Colorado and not even considered in California reaks of partisian politics. Obviously the Democrats want to take from the Republican column but will not even consider the reverse.
You are right, you should be 100% for it or 100% against it in all states, but that is not the issue here.
Where did I say I would vote on it based on "partisan methodology instead of the issue itself"?