Quote:
|
Originally Posted by adysav
If the argument turns out to be invalid for incest then it should also be invalid for homosexuality.
It determines whether the people who are pro homosexual relationships are actually in favour of greater rights to all consenting couples.
|
Let me see if i can underail this discussion:
"Marriage should be for loving consenting adults who aren't related and aren't animals." The whole "not being related" thing is now explicit rather than implicit. Let there be no more discussion of incest, because now you know that that isn't what is being advocated. If you want to argue the merits of incest you should start a new thread.