asaris

First, you should note that I'm not trying to prove that Christ's miracles happened. Sure, I believe that they did, but that's not what I'm trying to prove. All I'm trying to prove is that they're not logically impossible.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that what you are arguing is that logical impossibility is co-extensive with natural impossibility; that is, that everything that is impossible according to the laws of nature is impossible according to the laws of logic, and vice versa. This seems to me to be an improbable position. Drawing a round square seems to be a different order of difficulty than walking on water. But even if you're right, there's still an epistemological problem.

We just aren't sure about what the laws of nature are; we think we have some idea, but of course, people have thought that in the past and been shown to be wrong. Some things that were impossible under Newtonian physics are possible under Einsteinian physics, and so it might be the case that some things impossible under Einsteinian physics turn out to be possible under some new physical theory. In fact, if I understand the theory (and, not being a physicist, I could be wrong), walking on water is in fact possible. Sure, it's very, very, very unlikely. But it's possible.

__________________
"Die Deutschen meinen, daß die Kraft sich in Härte und Grausamkeit offenbaren müsse, sie unterwerfen sich dann gerne und mit Bewunderung:[...]. Daß es Kraft giebt in der Milde und Stille, das glauben sie nicht leicht."

"The Germans believe that power must reveal itself in hardness and cruelty and then submit themselves gladly and with admiration[...]. They do not believe readily that there is power in meekness and calm."

-- Friedrich Nietzsche