The thing that bugs me the most about the second document is the lack of consistency. In some spots they superscript the "th" while in others they do not. The first document consistently does not superscript them. Additionally, in one spot they refer to it as "111 F.L.S." while in another "111th F.L.S." with the "th" superscripted.
While I have never been a military typist I have, most assuredly, been indoctrinated into the military protocol of consistency. Perhaps it's a fluke as I know plenty of mistakes are made that fall outside of SOP but it strikes me as odd.
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.
Last edited by onetime2; 09-19-2004 at 02:36 PM..
|