Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Outpour
To which I contend that such an ideology is a quick, convenient, and shoddy way to disregard arguments opposing a belief in something irrational which has no foundation for definitiveness.
Religion serves to explain what science cannot, or what people will not accept (humans who are egotistical in nature (everyone) will not accept the utter insignificance of existence). But to give the illusion of credibility they crush contestants with absurdity and irrebuttable explanations.
|
To which I respond that such an argument is a quick, convienient, and shoddy way to disregard arguments opposing a belief in something rational which has a foundation for definitiveness.
You still cannot prove that religious people are wrong, you can only theorize and try to rationalize that which is inherently irrational. And because of such, the belief in a god is just as valid as the belief in no god.
