View Single Post
Old 09-16-2004, 04:11 PM   #32 (permalink)
OpieCunningham
Loser
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Sorry I never have agreed with that tenant of thought. Its an excuse for people unwilling to make a decision in today’s world of fuzzy values. Its the sort of thing that lets everyone feel good about themselves no matter how stupid they are. Some opinions are just flat out wrong, someone can have them, but that does not make them any more correct.
By your very response your are conceding the fact that opinions are not either correct or incorrect.

How can something be "more correct" if there is correct and there is incorrect? There is no mostly correct and somewhat incorrect just as there is no mostly fact and somewhat non-fact. If something is not completely a fact, it is a non-fact. Which is exactly why there are no correct or incorrect opinions - regardless of whether you believe it is factual to state that it is a means of letting everyone "feel good".

If you want to eliminate the binary nature of correct and incorrect and claim there is a middle ground - then your statement would be accurate. But in doing so, I would be able to "prove" that the color blue is the most correct color for everyone and anyone who disagreed would be mostly wrong. I would also be able to prove that I don't exist or the sun is taking a shower in my bathroom.

The problem with political debate in general is that people believe that many of their opinions are undeniable. Ustwo, you are the preeminent practitioner of that mode of thought around here. The only things which are facts are things that have already occured - nothing in the future is a fact, it is a degree of probability. It is highly probable that the sun will shine tomorrow. It is not a fact. It is to some degree probable that Iraq will fall into a civil war. There is another degree of probability that Iraq will become a shining beacon of democracy. It is patently false to claim either scenario is a fact or a "correct" opinion.

1 + 1 = 2. This is a fact. It is not an opinion. If you disagree that 1 + 1 = 2, you are not expressing an opinion, you are contradicting a fact. There is no more correct or somewhat incorrect aspect to 1 + 1 = 2.

Dogs are nice. This is an opinion. It is not a fact. If you disagree that dogs are nice you are expressing an opinion, not stating a fact. There is no more correct or somewhat incorrect aspect to Dogs are nice.
OpieCunningham is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360