View Single Post
Old 09-16-2004, 01:00 PM   #33 (permalink)
OpieCunningham
Loser
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by smooth
But I don't agree that we shouldn't have more than one term. Although, at first glance, the argument that presidents should not spend too much time campaigning is persuasive, I think the second re-election campaign has an important function:

how do we know when the US public supports the policies it's president is implementing? While I may disagree with them, the majority of the voting public may actually support what the current president is doing. Even if kerry took office at the end of an 8 year bush presidency (for example), he ought to continue with the policies that the majority of the voting public supported--just like bush should have done with clinton's popular policies.

it makes no sense, in regards to the long-term health and political environemnt of the nation, to whip one's constituency into a frenzy for the first couple of years and dismantle everything the prior president did.
There are a number of reasons this is likely to be less of a concern than you imagine. For one, it addresses two major problems with a two-term Presidency:

1- The last year of the first term is spent almost exclusively on campaigning. This serves only one purpose: to get re-elected. It is a huge waste of time for the country.
2- The effects of the first term do not necessarily drive the acts of the second. During the first term, a President must be far more concientious of public opinion precisely because he must achieve a second term. The second term is, in essence, a free reign. Recall regulations would act as the impetus to listen to the citizens during the single term scenario. There is nothing in a second term which has that power.

As for continuing on the path laid out by the voting public - this is still easily achieved by whomever of the next set of candidates more closely matches the beloved, exiting President. Of course, in both cases (the existing and this scenario), the likelyhood that a new President will follow similar policies to the previous one is not anything close to a guarantee or even something I have seen much evidence of (though, it would depend on how fine a method of measuring policy differences you use).
OpieCunningham is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360