Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Also while I see many condemnations of anything the US does fighting wise, I have yet to see anyone who would be, shall I say, a 'Bush hater'  , say anything negative about the purposeful targeting of civilians in Iraq by terror organizations. |
I am not a "Bush-hater" (your moniker). Nor am I a "Bush-Butt-Lackey" (my sarcastic moniker).
Yet I have
repeatedly and
consistently condemned the terrorist targeting of civilians. Not only in Iraq, but also Ireland, Chile, Sierra Leone, America, and probably some others I can't explicitly remember. You can search for the specific posts if you wish.
If you can't see them, it's because you're not opening your eyes.
Quote:
|
We know that Iraq had nothing directly to do with 9/11, nor has the Bush admin ever said they did. We do know that Iraq had dealings with Al Queda and provided safe haven to Abu Musab Zarqawi who is currently leading the terrorist attacks in Iraq.
|
They had "dealings"? We also know that Iraq did specifically
not support Al Queda. And if we're justifying the invasion of countries that had "dealings" with Al Queda, when do the attacks on Saudi Arabia, Yemen, the Sudan, France, Germany, UK and Turkey begin? Oh, and the United States... I wonder how Bush would explain
that one?
Quote:
|
The hypocrisy is so thick you could cut it with a knife.
|
I agree with you. The Bush Administration should really stop it.
Mr Mephisto