Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Muddy the waters, confuse the vote, 'Sure Kerry was a schumck, but so was George!'
|
lol!
Unbelievably strange tack for Kerry to take. He still has a chance to attack Bush where it matters most to Dems: Iraq/911/Terrorism. Why isn't he dredging up all matter of inconsisteny/controversy/conspiracy for the swing voters regarding Bush's strongest quality - his hawkish stand on terrorism??
Another tactical error on Kerry's part.
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
i do not understand why rove et al chose the tack of introducing the relation or non relation to vietnam into the election--
|
Because its a sound, proven political tactic in winning an election.