|
The documents do appear false, but is anyone actually arguing that Bush served and fulfilled his duty? Or that he didn't avoid active duty during a war that he supported? I didn't see the CBS report, but I understand that they treated the documents with skepticism. It seems that CBS jumped the gun in order to be the first to report this. CBS deserves criticism, but it doesn't completely negate the network's ability to report news. If these papers are false it means that Bush's military record is slightly less nefarious. Congratulations to you conservatives who investigated further. It's unfortunate that you can't display the same level of cognizance and skepticism with Fox news, the Drudge Report, or Rush Limbaugh. You win the battle but lose the war.
|