Quote:
Originally Posted by Lebell
Isreal has been an opportunist, using the Arab's unreasoning hatred against them. Had the Arabs not attacked in 67', they would be enjoying the borders that they pine for today.
|
I don’t think they would. Reviewing the actions the incoming immigrants taking, the blatant disregard for agreed immigration caps, and reference to UN addresses by the founding Zionists paint a clear picture of intentions. IMO terrorist groups Hagana, Irgun, and Stern Gang combined with the perpetuating Zionist philosophy of then and now; I humbly disagree.
The Israeli’s retaliate when innocents are killed. Prior to the aggression in 1967 you mention; terrorist attacks like: King David Hotel, July 22, 1946. Sharafat, Feb. 7, 1951. Deir Yassin, April 10, 1948. Falameh, April 2, 1951. Naseruddine, April 14, 1948. Quibya, Oct. 14, 1953. Carmel, April 20, 1948. Nahalin, March, 28, 1954. Al-Qabu, May 1, 1948. Gaza, Feb. 28, 1955. Beit Kiras, May 3, 1948. Khan Yunis, May 31, 1955. Beitkhoury, May 5, 1948. Khan Yunis Again, Aug. 31, 1955 Az-Zaytoun, May 6, 1948. Tiberia, Dec. 11, 1955. Wadi Araba, May 13, 1950. As-Sabha, Nov. 2, 1955. Gaza Again, April 5, 1956. Houssan, Sept. 25, 1956. Rafa, Aug. 16, 1956. Qalqilyah, Oct. 10, 1956. Ar-Rahwa, Sept. 12, 1956. Kahr Kassem, Oct. 29, 1956. Gharandal, Sept. 13, 1956. Gaza Strip, Nov. 1956. Gaza Strip, Nov. 1956. occured.
This combined with the same unwarranted expansion that occurs to this day left the Palestinians little choice. What other options do you think were available?
Quote:
If they had accepted the Oslo accords, they would have a Palestinian state today.
|
Let's take a look at that
HERE
Again the intentions show that they indeed would not have have a state; if they did- it was set to fail by sheer design. Its very apparent the goals were the same as they've always been.
Quote:
I have no illusion that Isreal wants all of it's historical land, but it is the Arabs who are giving it to them on a silver platter by continuing trying to destroy them.
|
Thanks for being the first to at least see it; for what it is. I"ll humbly comment that Israel wants all of what the Zionist view as being their historical land. If historical value is being place upon religious story; then by their very own source and nature; the Canaanites and those descended are the rightful heirs.
What reaction do you think the Palestinians should exhibit? Theres a word for whats happening to them; it seems to me if it were any other culture that would be apparent. As always thats my opinion.
They