Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Slavakion
I'm not sure that I follow. How does this relate to evolution? (I know you read it a long time ago) The moon dust, if created, could have simply floated away. There is only enough gravity on the moon to create an "atmosphere" of about an inch on the surface (or something like that). Any impacts causing rocks to fracture creating dust would most likely throw the dust into space.
|
Ahahahahaha... Right, that dust would have to be moving VERY GOD DAMN
FAST and for quite a distance to actually leave the atmosphere of the moon.
I think he's trying to link the moon, and therefore, universal evolution to
that of this planets. Which kind of a weird way to go about it.
I'm not anywhere near convinced that there could be evolution of any kind
on Earth, but there is very scientific, mathematical proof that the universe
evolved in some kind of way. Most Earth-based proof for Evolution is sketchy
at best. Most scientists can all agree that species can adapt, but never
really evolve. If you can even breed outside your own species (not even
different genus' can mate,) how on Earth could anything evolve into... Us.
Up in the top article is even says that mutations only take away traits, they
can't create new ones. So where'd all of our new-fangled contractions such
as ARMS come from.
Not really in the arguing mood, neither side of you
posters are giving any real evidence supporting your claim to be either an
evolutionist or creationist, and just throwing out articles that may or may-not
refute something. (Not saying I have any evidence either, just logically-
supported statements.) I like philosophy. Neither really Creationist nor
Evolutionist, just Pure, gotta love that.
(And to all you guys saying that one thing really doesn't
show much -- if you found something, that mathematically disproves
something in Relativity, wouldn't it be wise to say that maybe Relativity is
wrong, or at least not-yet complete?)