Quote:
|
Originally Posted by OpieCunningham
I'd love to come back on the first portion of your post, but I've already had my response to your standard "I know the truth and because you disagree, you're blind fools" nonsense deleted.
But I will come back on the second -
If we're going to start comparing the depths of accusations, I submit mine: Bush eats little babies because he likes the taste of little baby flesh.
That clearly trumps the moral depravity of Kerry's treason.
But since it's ultimately juvenile to compare the depths of accusations - let's take a look at the situation where we throw out both sets of accusations:
- Bush, as a youth, could have tried to go to Vietnam. He didn't.
- Kerry, as a youth, could have avoided going to Vietnam. But he didn't.
|
Opie I don't know why I bother, but I will try yet again.
Kerry tried to get out of going to Vietnam by getting a deferment to go study in France. It was rejected. He took the quickest way out. I would commend him for his service if he didn't lie to congress etc when he got back.
Kerry TRIED to avoid Vietnam, he failed, he figured out a quick way home getting three purple hearts with zero hospitalization time, and then he lied about his service causing suffering for US POW's. We have what he said to congress on tape, with his long face lying his way to political fortune with the left, that can not be denied. You won't address it I know.