Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Edit: I felt I should add this.
If the worst things said about Bush in the Vietnam Years are true then his father tried to keep him out of the war, he was crappy at showing up on time, and used his connections to get away with it.
If the worst things said about John Kerry are true, he knownly gave aid and comfort to the enemy by lying to congress, and added to the suffering of American POW's in Vietnam.
The first one shows a spoiled foturnate son.
The second shows a traitor.
|
I'd love to come back on the first portion of your post, but I've already had my response to your standard "I know the truth and because you disagree, you're blind fools" nonsense deleted.
But I will come back on the second -
If we're going to start comparing the depths of accusations, I submit mine: Bush eats little babies because he likes the taste of little baby flesh.
That clearly trumps the moral depravity of Kerry's treason.
But since it's ultimately juvenile to compare the depths of accusations - let's take a look at the situation where we throw out both sets of accusations:
- Bush, as a youth, could have tried to go to Vietnam. He didn't.
- Kerry, as a youth, could have avoided going to Vietnam. But he didn't.