|
Ah, yes, but Lebell you did the typical response to this idea: you simply dismissed what was said without question. You can't preach about this being blatently foolish if you have nothing to support it. You seem to be intelligent, does it make sense to you that someone is arguing that an idea is foolish, despite not doing much if any research of his or her own? Of course not. What Boatin and I are saying to you is that you are your own worst enemy if you want people to pay attention to your post. Your quick dismissal leads people to believe that you have just read a few posts and ayou think you know better. Well, I don't think that you know so much more than some of these people. I, myself, have been investigating this problem for weeks. I have contacted several people who are qualified to answer some of the questions this thread and the other bring up. Aeronautical engineers, reporters, firefighters who have been involved with multiple plane crashes. I included all of this information in a letter to my congressman. All it seems that you have done, based on your response, is formed a quick opinnion. What if you're wrong? Let's just try to imagine that this improbable story is actuially the truth. Would you be willing to admit that ther is even a possibility? I hope so, otherwise you are being led blindly.
|