|
Superbelt, twas I that mentioned the nosecone. I still haven't been able to explain it with any logical argument. And I've really tried. There are simply too many improbablilties here to completly discount on the same level as the holocuast (not sure why you used that example, Lebell, when the moon landing might have offended less people). To Kurant, the rescue workers all said that there was almost no debreis when they got the the crash site, roughly 10-15 minutes after the impact. Pentagon officials have been at odds with several pentagon and former pentagon workers over what they saw. The official stance of the Pentagon has been disputed by several eye whitnesses in the Pentagon. People on the highway have also had conflicting reports. The FAA didn't know the plane was hijacked until practically the plane had already supposedly hit. These don't seem like the eyewhitness accounts you referr to in your post. The list seemingly stops there. Now I have a pretty active and able imagination, as you probably all can guess, but it's not much of a stretch to see that the eye whitness acounts really don't prove or disprove anything. They are mut in the case for the official story. What isn't mut is the facts. The bottom line is that there are too many odd ends and improbablilties to simply dismiss the possibility that there is a larger story to be told. Ther is no harm at all in investigating what happened to find the truth. I would consider leaving the incodent so open and unsolved to be careless. If the plane crashed into the building, let's prove it. If not, let's prove it.
People also believe that Avril Lavigne writes her own music. People will believe anything they are told by the media these days.
P.S. If anyone took this to be a personal attack, please let me know. I do not intend this post to be anything but informative and the goal of my post is to help open some people up to a possibility. Thanks for reading.
|