Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

Hard8s · 09-08-2004, 05:07 PM

The whole reason this case took off is two fold (1) she was 8 months pregnant at the time, (2) it happened on christmas eve! If either of these two were missing it would have been back page news, but its not. Personally from what I have read and heard about the case I could find him guilty right now with out the body, all from just his actions. (1) carrying on an affair, and telling her his wife was dead. (2) his wife ends up dead, (3) he carries on like it was no big thing, even trying to continue on with the affair. (4) he tries to sell HER car, and the house, (5) he changes his apearance, and disappears with a lot of money, (6) continues to go out to the area she was found, before she was found there! (7) his alibi is very fishy (pun intended - C'mon who goes fishing for his first time out on christmas eve alone on a cold and windy morning!) (8) and on a boat that he bought that his wife and the woman he had an affair with knew nothing about! (9) when confronted by the woman he was having an affair with, couldn't answer some of the most basic question from her. He was very evasive, saying he knew things but couldn't tell her the whole story. Now if you are innocent wouldn't you want the woman you're sleeping with to know that you're innocent? (10) When they wanted to bring in search dogs, Scott specifically asked if they were going to bring in cadaver dogs?? This was at the time when they were still looking for her in an active search for a missing person, not after they found her remains. (11) read through the recorded phone transcripts and watch him squirm and lie!!!

While just my opinion, I tried to wait to hear most of the information before I made up my mind, I would find him guilty at this point. If someone else did do it, he at least had first hand knowledge of it, and thats enough for me.

09-08-2004, 05:07 PM	#40 (permalink)
Hard8s Addict Location: Wherever I am!	The whole reason this case took off is two fold (1) she was 8 months pregnant at the time, (2) it happened on christmas eve! If either of these two were missing it would have been back page news, but its not. Personally from what I have read and heard about the case I could find him guilty right now with out the body, all from just his actions. (1) carrying on an affair, and telling her his wife was dead. (2) his wife ends up dead, (3) he carries on like it was no big thing, even trying to continue on with the affair. (4) he tries to sell HER car, and the house, (5) he changes his apearance, and disappears with a lot of money, (6) continues to go out to the area she was found, before she was found there! (7) his alibi is very fishy (pun intended - C'mon who goes fishing for his first time out on christmas eve alone on a cold and windy morning!) (8) and on a boat that he bought that his wife and the woman he had an affair with knew nothing about! (9) when confronted by the woman he was having an affair with, couldn't answer some of the most basic question from her. He was very evasive, saying he knew things but couldn't tell her the whole story. Now if you are innocent wouldn't you want the woman you're sleeping with to know that you're innocent? (10) When they wanted to bring in search dogs, Scott specifically asked if they were going to bring in cadaver dogs?? This was at the time when they were still looking for her in an active search for a missing person, not after they found her remains. (11) read through the recorded phone transcripts and watch him squirm and lie!!! While just my opinion, I tried to wait to hear most of the information before I made up my mind, I would find him guilty at this point. If someone else did do it, he at least had first hand knowledge of it, and thats enough for me. __________________ If ignorance is bliss, then wipe this smile off my face! Last edited by Hard8s; 09-08-2004 at 05:33 PM..