Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tecoyah
Thank you Ustwo....your reply (at least the second half) was concise and accurate. Truly the information withn the world community did point to WMD production in Iraq. As this thread was meant to deal with this issue in its entirety, I truly appreciate the input you have given. Part of the reasoning for invasion was indeed the failure to comply with U.N. resolutions, and this must be taken into account in the grand scheme of things. Still...the facts remain that we were told of weapons that simply do not exist. These may have been moved to Syria, but there is no factual information to confirm this.
Please continue to defend.
|
Until they are found I can't defend. Now its quite possible that Saddam didn't have any WMD's and provoked war by ignoring the resolutions and interfearing with the weapons inspectors because he was just an idiot. I am also not overly worried if Syria has them because if they do they would have to be raving lunatics to give them to any terrorists to use. If they did so and we were able to link them to it, they would cease to exsist as a government, at least with Bush in office.
Now if your thoughts are Iraq must have had WMD's and they must directly threaten the US for there to be just cause for war then I don't think you will be satisfied anytime soon, but I would like you to answer one question as well.
Did Bill Clinton lie about WMD's?