Quote:
|
Originally Posted by phyzix525
Instead of having to defend, why don't you prove that the WMDs were not shipped to syria. This is a wasted thread.  |
It's rather impossible to prove a negative.
But since you suggested that the concept of this thread be turned around, I think it should be pointed out that the anti-war rationalization is automatic. There is never any need to prove the necessity of no war. By default, no war is the correct choice. It is the act of war which must be proven. We do not go around looking for reasons to NOT invade a country. If you believe there are reasons TO invade a country - it is your responsibility to prove those reasons.