Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ARTelevision
yes, innocent until proven guilty is the way to go.
why is there an issue with that?
don't you see why it's a good thing to suspend judgement?
why the need to jump to a conclusion?
|
I agree and I think that the system is treating him as an innocent until proven guilty.
It seems what people are doing here is responding to the preponderance of evidence against this man. He's clearly a pathological liar. The taped telephone conversations with his mistress, Amber Frey, have revealed that much about his character.
Amber Frey
The rest of his alibi from the begining of this mess was very weak. I do a lot of fishing. A lot of fishing as in every chance I get. I have never been fishing in a solo trip on Christmas Eve. That smells.
The rest of the timeline doesn't add up to much of a good story for him.
Innocent? Maybe the pile of evidence is circumstantial. Maybe. Personally I don't think so. The noose is tighening and a guilty verdict seems unavoidable.
Here's a link to the CourtTv coverage of the case:
Laci Peterson - Case Coverage