View Single Post
Old 09-07-2004, 07:14 AM   #63 (permalink)
Mephisto2
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by stingc
China executes so many people because damn near everything carries the death penalty over there.
There are 68 offences that are punishable by death. Not exactly "damn near everything", but certainly a lot more than most other countries.

Quote:
Considering how minor many of the offenses are (in our eyes), and how large China's population is, the numbers are actually very small.
When you oppose the death penalty on moral grounds, a single killing is too much.

Quote:
Think about the numbers of people who sell drugs (they include nicotine too I think) or make porn in western world. That's a lot more than a few thousand/year. I'm certainly not advocating following China's example though!
China prescribes the death penalty for some 68 offences, including some 28 non-violent crimes such as; political crimes, bigamy, bribery, cigarette smuggling, corruption, disturbing the peace, drug-related crimes, economic crimes, financial fraud, forgery, grave-digging theft, pimping, publication of pornographic material, robbing of petrol, sale of counterfeit money, sale of false birth certificates and sterility certificates, sale of false invoices, sale of pelts of pandas, selling harmful foodstuffs, tax fraud, tax evasion, theft of antiques, theft of cows camels or horses, trafficking in national treasures, as well as internet hacking and cyber crimes. China metes out the death penalty to anyone convicted of trafficking 50 grams (1.764 ounces) or more of heroin.

REF: http://www.angelfire.com/stars/dorina/dpchina.html

Quote:
Well, my understanding of Judeo-Christian values is that it is ok to kill in self-defense or as punishment for extreme sins. At least the old testament is like that. In fact, it gets pretty brutal in parts. Then Jesus came along and said to forgive everybody. I've hardly ever met anybody who truly follows this though. People always make exceptions, and everyone's ideas on what's acceptable and what isn't differ quite a bit (as you're seeing in this thread).
Most certainly. The differences between the Old Testament and the New Testament are pretty profound really.


Mr Mephisto
Mephisto2 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360