Conventions
I'm curious what everyone thinks about the 2 conventions. Polling seems to show that the RNC was more successfull convincing voters then that DNC. Do you think this has to do with the fact that the RNC is later then the DNC? I'd think having it later would give an avantage to the republicans. If this is the case why don't the two parties fight for the later spots.
Also the success of the RNC could also be attributed to the types of speaches. The RNC was a mainly non-stop kerry bashing where the DNC was mainly non-stop kerry promoting. Do you think taking a negative campaign gives an advantage over a positive one? Given a choice between your canidate going positive or negative which would you pefer?
There is lots of questions here to answer lets try to keep it civil.
|