i fully support gun ownership but stompy articulated something i've been thinking about for a while.
when the bill of rights was passed, the United States had just come off a revolutionary war where their militias were armed with firepower similar to the British (one of the most formidable armies in the world at that point).
now-a-days, soldiers are so highly trained with such sophisticated weaponry a militia would have absolutely no chance to defend themselves from the government. if we're talking about people with standard firearms against the military, the casualty ratio would be disastrous. defending the citizenry has become nearly irrelevant to the issue of firearms. perhaps it's a hedge, but certainly not a check to the governments power.
times have changed...
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.
~ Winston Churchill
|