Quote:
Originally Posted by pocon1
Also, I think less damage was done to the Pentagon because it is a military building, and its standards are higher. It is our head of the military, so it would not be completely crushed by a standard attack. Isn't this the reason for the rings of hallways, to isolate wartime damage? Also, notice that when most missiles hit buildings, they explode, but not in massive fireballs. Plane fuel burns, missiles explode. Look at the Oklahoma bombing. I don't think the US uses incendiary missiles. If we have to hit a hardened target and punch a hole through it, we use high explosives. If we hit a soft, flammable target, we use incendiary bombs. To deliver enough incendiary material in a missile would be cost prohibitive. Much more power can be put in a smaller missile with high explosives, so that is what we use.
I'm hitting home runs, give me another conspiracy theory. I'm typing with one hand behind my back and chewing bubble gum. Can I get a "hell yeah!"
|
He obviously is not that genius, considering we have discovered all sorts of loop holes in his attacks and we will soon discover all of his diabolical conspiracies
.