Quote:
Originally Posted by Halx
Lebell, if you're basing your decision off of what your enemy said, you've got something wrong.
Al Qaeda stated that under Bush, they would continue to thrive, but Kerry's methods would be their end. What can you derive from this? Absolutely NOTHING. They're playing a 2/7 off-suit hand in poker. They're bluffing. Their entire statement should be null and void in the eyes of any rational thinker.
So now you're telling us all that a decorated war veteran is not fit to defend the country, while a dumb rich party kid who avoided the draft and was frozen solid for 7 minutes after he was told the country was under attack IS? Check your logic, sir!
|
No, I don't base any decision of this importance on any one factor, but I also surely weigh them all and give some more importance than others.
I believe differently than you in that Kerry would effectively deal with Al Quaeda, decorations aside.