Quote:
|
Originally Posted by roachboy
it is a specific analysis, onetime.
you say its wrong, but then wont address the actual content of the article.
if you are going to play that way, why bother in the first place?
|
IMO, there was little content in the article and that's all the response it deserved.
Who knows Arnold's logic better, Arnold or Mr. Saletan? Saletan makes spurious claims as to Arnold's true beliefs and makes further assertions which haven't a shred of truth.
Examples:
To say that the Iraq campaign is "a complete failure" is only one obvious example of his intellectual dishonesty.
Another, "The American economy is performing far below par." Please tell me where the truth is here? He obviously has no clue what par is historically for the economy or where the economy stands today.
He offered no specifics whatsoever and you tout his analysis, yet you expect substantive specifics in return. If you require substantive proof of one you should require substantive proof of the other.