Quote:
Originally Posted by onetime2
I just finished listening to him read his book American Soldier. Impressive man with a lot of insight.
One thing of note in the book is that Bush constantly asked the General if he had everything he needed to fight the war and the answer was always yes.
General Franks asked Bush to work into one of his speeches the fact that major combat operations are over. He did just that out on the carrier. The reason Franks' wanted it was because of the professed support from our other coalition partners who would send troops once combat was over.
I haven't heard one peep out of Bush trying to place the blame for that statement on the military leadership who requested it. He bore the brunt of the attacks and took responsibility. It's character like that which makes me steadfast in my support for George Bush's reelection.
|
i thought that was a really good way to put it. i think bush is taking a lot of hits for the actions of his subordonates, this gives dems a lot of ammo to attack him with, but if you think, it is one of the best qualities you can have.
__________________
"The difference between commiment and involvment is like a ham and egg breakfast the chicken was involved but the pig was commited"
"Thrice happy is the nation that has a glorious history. Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." Theodore Roosevelt
|