i dont suppose that you would care to say anything more about your munich reference there, would you?
perhaps you are of the richard perle school of Deep Thought about international relations?
does that mean you imagine there were no good reasons for any country to have opposed bushwar?
and do you manage to still hold this position given that every element of the bush rationale for war presented to the united nations has turned out to have been a lie/wildly incorrect interpretation of fragmentary/questionable data?
how do you do that? simple denial?
the question of the french law is another matter--i would be happy to discuss it----but not in the context framed by your appeasement remark.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
Last edited by roachboy; 08-31-2004 at 11:08 AM..
|