Originally Posted by smooth

I would rather have a pollster than someone who sticks "by his guns on everything he has preached" even when the evidence shows that his decision was the incorrect one. His is a dangerous attitude--I don't want a stubborn individual, who has bragged about not paying attention to what the public thinks, to be leading a nation that is supposed to pay attention to its people.

At least a pollster is willing to place his agenda on the back burner and do what the majority of the people desire. But he obviously has balls. That comment just demonstrates ignorance and vitriol. Also, the only reason he wouldn't have your best interest, and if he only listens to the majority of the people via polls and political winds, then the conclusion I am left to reach is that you are not in the majority of the population. You might want to think about that when you start blasting off at the mouth.