View Single Post
Old 08-26-2004, 09:56 PM   #8 (permalink)
irateplatypus
can't help but laugh
 
irateplatypus's Avatar
 
Location: dar al-harb
ok, i just didn't equate speech with congressional testimony.

i don't think this warrants a brand new thread... but i'll certainly do my best to respond to your questions.

my problem with kerry's testimony is this: a lot of what he said regarding the war crimes that were allegedly perpetrated by his fellow veterans are unsubstantiated. thousands upon thousands of veterans will tell you that they never took part in or saw the kinds of things kerry describes. kerry, as a young lieutenant (the lowest officer rank in the heirarchy) spending 4 months in combat accused the soldiers still lying in the mud in vietnam of horrible deeds. a lieutenant on a swift boat for four months is going to make theaterwide accusations of heinous war crimes, with responsibility going to the top of the chain of command? those who are familiar with military organizational structure know that it would be a rare thing for a lieutenant to make such observations about the entire American war effort with any degree of authority.

so what does this have to do w/my statement about dole? well, kerry had no problem testifying before congress that his fellow soldiers where acting like the Mongol hoard while his brothers in arms where held captive in enemy prisons. yet when senator dole, being at the very least kerry's equal on the issue, expresses doubt on something as trivial as the level of desert in an awarded medal people express outrage at senator dole.

it seems like there is a double standard. if the pertinent concern is the respect of veterans as the washpost article suggests, then what right do any of us have to look down our nose at senator dole when he questions a single veteran who, on a world stage, indicted nearly EVERY OTHER veteran he served with?

accusing kerry of fudging on his medals on a cable news show is drawing more outrage on veteran's respect grounds than kerry's broad attack on the soldiers in vietnam before congress.

does this seem right to anyone?
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.

~ Winston Churchill
irateplatypus is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360