Quote:
Originally Posted by Scipio
Interestingly, measures that seek to root out inefficiency or that require justification for every dollar spent are often more costly than the inefficiencies they propose to combat. President Carter initiated a system called zero base budgeting where any agency or administrative unit that received money had to justify every dollar they received, not just increases or decreases from year to year. Traditionally, the budget process for next year begins with the budget from this year, and makes changes on the margin. As its name suggests, zero base budgeting starts from scratch.
A funny thing happened when they went through all the expenditures. They found that most of them were reasonable, and that a relatively small number of budget outlays were "bad." Moreover, the additional administrative overhead both in the agencies and in the budget process itself was found to be too costly to justify the gains.
Just a bit of history.
|
Zero based budgeting is a good theory. As you point out there are problems with it. Most advocates of this system do not expect every department to go through the process every year. In fact the best thinking for the practice prefers that a certain segment of the departments go through it each year and the practice is rotated through the other departments as years go by.
The serious question also remains how thoroughly this process was enacted in the Carter years and how committed people were to rooting out waste.