Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rekna
What i'm saying is if science is going to hinge all of it's beliefs on these theorys which require many leaps like life spontaniously creating itself without any help whatsoever then i'm just as well off believing god had a role in the creation. Science can't recreate it but even if they can it is taking them a long time to recreate it in a lab with that specific goal and you expect me to believe that just happend on its own? When it comes to creation science asks us to make many leaps and bounds. When you compare it to creation with a hand of God involved it seems much more plausable and the answer is much simpler. So use okkums razor.
|
The period of time humans have experimented with electro-chemical reaction is currently measured in decades. In that time we have made the basis of RNA (tholins) just by chance. In the early 80s'. Carl Sagan wanted to see what the atmosphere of an early Earth would do if Zapped by lightning. The result was an organic compound now called Tholins. These compounds when mixed in a liquid combine to form something very much like RNA. The Earth (Nature if you will) has had the better part of 4,000,000,000,000 years to experiment, in a laboratory significantly larger than Dr. Sagans. If we understand the nature of chemical reaction, it is not hard to accept that the likelihood of some level of self replication, over a four billion year timeframe is relatively good.
That said, the likelihood of some all powerful dude, yanking the rib from a guy, and turning it into a woman would fail under the Razor theory you suggest we follow.