TheKak sums it up pretty well. The old Pascal's wager defense against both agnostics and atheists only really works if there was only one monotheistic religion and the choice was either it or nothing. But with thousands of religions available in the phone book, my resp[onse is to be agnostic.
I've always defined agnostic as the following:
Quote:
|
One who holds that man knows nothing of anything other than the material world.
|
In essense, you can have all your holy books, rituals, holidays, beliefs, symbols, icons, and holy art. But in the end, it's all just theory. No proof for or against.