Originally Posted by Bill O'Rights

Let me preface with..."As I understand it", because I could be wrong. (Hey...it's happened) When the party says that the American Indian should have their property rights restored...what they mean is that property that was legaly given to them, per treaty, by the United States Congress, only to have that property taken from them. This includes lands such as the Black Hills, of South Dakota. This is sacred land to them, and we, by violation of a still binding treaty, forced them from, and proceeded to occupy it. Plus, I think we carved some white men's faces on it.

Is this likely to happen? No...it's not. Not all Libertarian position is gold. The principle is sound...but the implementation is really not feasible.