Well, ok, I see the point that he sort of fumbled the answer, but I'm still not convinced his answer was stupid or revealed that he doesn't know what "sovereignty" means.
It was a really open-ended question (tough to get it exactly b/c there is a gap): What does tribal sovereignty mean in the 21st century and how do you resolve conflicts between the tribes and federal and state governments?
Unless you dive into an in-depth discussion of the relationship between tribes and governments (which I don't think is appropriate for that kind of environment), you don't have much you can say.
Would I have been impressed and surprised by a detailed response? Sure. Do I think Bush comes off badly by not giving one. Not really.
Again, voting for Kerry, so this is not an ideologically-based position.
|