I agree with most others, it shouldn't be a requirement.
The president only gives his permission so that generals can carry out military decisions.
He doesn't go to the front lines with a gun or plan in detail how the battles will be carried out. He might be commander in chief, but with all the advisors and other people helping him along, I don't feel that prior experience is nice.
Honestly, I think candidates use it as a crutch. Kerry's "Vote for me, I got purple hearts" or McCain's "Vote for me, I was a POW". So? I mean, I'm sorry you went through that and all, but please tell me exactly WHY this means you're a better president than someone who had absolutely no military experience.
I don't really like Bush, but I did find it utterly ridiculous when people were giving him shit for not being in the military. Instead of faking documents or whatever he did, he should've just said "No, I didn't serve, and it really doesn't matter."
__________________
I love lamp.
|