Quote:
Originally posted by wonderwench
John O'Neill is a Democrat.
History has shown that most of what Kerry said was exageration and for self-promotion.
He spent more time disparaging the reputations of his fellow soldiers than he spent in Viet Nam. Why isn't he highlighting his anti-war activities in his campaign?
|
Party may be relevant to you, but it means little to me.
Your interpretation of history says that. I make no such conclusion.
Once again we come to the same point....I consider Kerry's criticism of the conduct of American soldiers in Vietnam as a condemnation of the policies that shaped the war, not the soldiers themselves. This is getting tiresome. You can keep repeating arguments that lost their vitality thirty years ago if you'd like. You can paste a transcript that talks about the breaking of the NVA by the South Vietnamese and consider it relevant, too. Personally, I'm getting sick of fending off the same Republican talking points over and over and over. If we can't come up with something more original than channeling our parties press releases, then it's going to be a long wait for november.